
SQA Engineer specializing in backend testing, API automation (RestAssured, Postman), and test automation with Java. Proficient in UI automation (Selenium, POM) and performance testing (JMeter). Experienced in manual, regression, database, and UAT testing, ensuring software quality across various platforms.


For years, cybersecurity leaders have repeated the mantra: “Employees are the Weakest link”
Statistically, yes — According to Verizon, Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR) 2023, 74% data breaches happen due to human error. But strategically, this narrative is incomplete and, in many cases, misleading.
But this narrative is focused on blame, not the fix. It highlights human mistakes, not organizational failures. Ignoring the fact that employees are not inherently malicious all the time, which is also backed by well researched stats. They’re simply the most accessible attack surface, shaped heavily by complicated systems, work culture, lack of leadership and workload. The human risk factor could be reduced by 85% according to KnowBe4, Phishing by Industry Benchmarking Report 2025.
In this blog we break down the real reason behind human-driven breaches and what organizations must fix to transform employees from a vulnerability into their strongest line of defense.
Cybersecurity professionals rests on the three pillars operational framework:
Firewalls, endpoint security, intrusion detection, encryption — essential, but insufficient without human alignment. Tools fail when misconfigured, ignored, or poorly integrated.
Policies, protocols, and structured response mechanisms. They define how technology is used and how incidents are handled. Weak processes amplify human error.
Unlike technology or procedures, people act with intention, emotion, fatigue, stress, and free will. But human error usually results from cognitive overload, unclear systems, poor design, or inadequate leadership, not incompetence.
This foundational three-pillar view highlights precisely why the “weakest link” mantra is strategically flawed and outdated. The error is not that the People pillar exists, but that we incorrectly treat it in isolation.
The Strategic Shift is Investing in the People Pillar. The success statistics are undeniable: the global Phish-Prone Percentage drops from an average baseline of over 33% to just 4.1% when training is done right, according to the KnowBe4 Phishing by Industry Benchmarking Report 2025. This is a measurable 85% reduction in risk
While humans are involved in roughly 74% of breaches, the deeper reason is not human nature, it’s the ecosystem humans operate in. Here are the true factors.
Social engineering is the exploitation of human trust, urgency, and authority cues. Modern day attackers use sophisticated, personalized, and psychologically engineered social engineering to make targets click a phishing link . And, still remains one of the most popular yet effective cyber threats to an organization not because employees are careless, but because attackers exploit predictable cognitive triggers.
People may fall for authority bias, urgency and sometimes even overconfidence. There are 30 human factors that research has identified (eg. stress, age, workload, personality, fatigue) which influences vulnerability, and attackers take advantage of these traits.
These behaviors stem from practicality, not malice:
One notable study found that 22% of employees who clicked a phishing link didn’t even recall doing so, highlighting how frequently security failures stem from distraction, not intent.
Security mistakes rarely come from ignorance they come from overload:
Beauceron Security reports that roughly 40% of phishing clicks occur when people are rushed or distracted. Humans fail when environments force them to operate in high-cognitive-load conditions.
One of the most overlooked vulnerabilities: Employees fear admitting mistakes.
When staff are afraid of punishment:
A “just culture” dramatically increases reporting, reduces damage, and accelerates containment.
Sending sensitive files to the wrong person, using personal devices, installing unapproved apps usually done for speed or convenience. Shadow IT expands the attack surface and bypasses central security controls.
Factors such as:
These are process failures as much as human failures.
Industry reports consistently reveal the human link:
The Takeaway:
Employees are not the threat exploitation of human behavior is.
Cybersecurity is not only a technological function, it’s a cultural one.
Executives who treat security as a shared organizational duty build stronger, more resilient teams. If leaders view security as “IT’s job,” employees will too.
One-time annual modules don’t work. High-performing organizations deliver:
Studies show continuous learning & awarness reduces phishing success by up to 86%.
People do not and can not follow what they do not understand, that’s why Policies should be
Organizational security improves dramatically, when employees feel safe reporting suspicious activities rather than remaining silent out of fear or worrying they’ll be blamed or punished.
Integrating gamified training exercises, alongside rewarding and providing recognition for secure practices empowers workforces to build positive and secure behaviors quickly.
Organizations should practice threat migitigration strategies in a human centric manner in order to establish a strong security culture
Removal of access prevents insider misuse and accidental exposure
Monitoring high-risk roles are essential.
Make it normal to say:
“I clicked something suspicious. What should I do?”
This single shift can prevent catastrophic breaches.
Implementing this six-point Human-Centric Security Model requires more than technical enforcement; it demands a strategic shift where security is treated as an integrated habit, not an isolated task. The greatest leverage in this model lies in moving Training from an event to a habit and fostering Psychological Safety. This is where organizations struggle with generic tools.

While statistics confirm that the human element is mostly involved in breaches, making employees the most frequently exploited entry point, viewing them merely as the “weakest link” is strategically flawed. The root cause of these errors often lies in systemic organizational failures, including inadequate exercises, high cognitive load, and flawed processes. An organization’s vulnerability is not really its workforce, but the lack of a human-centric security framework.

JMeter is a powerful tool for any SQA engineer looking to ensure their applications can handle real-world traffic. Whether you’re testing a web application or a backend service, it provides the flexibility to simulate hundreds or even thousands of users. My journey with JMeter has helped me identify bottlenecks, tune system performance, and ensure our applications remain robust under heavy loads.
If you’re new to load testing, don’t worry—JMeter is beginner-friendly but grows with you as you become more proficient. So give it a try and happy testing!